How much meat is produced and consumed by the frg. Statistics of food consumption in the USSR and the Russian Federation. Production and consumption of meat in modern Russia

As can be seen from the comparison of meat and fish consumption maps on the left, global fish consumption does not supplement or does not supplement meat consumption. Many of the carnivorous countries — the United States, Spain, Australia, and New Zealand — are also in the top category of fish, consuming more than 20 pounds of fish per capita per year. Canada and most countries in Western and Northern Europe also consume a lot of meat, as well as fish. However, meat-loving Argentines and Brazilians eat relatively small fish, less than 10 pounds a year.

A slightly different way to look at it is presented on the map on the left, which shows the percentage of animal proteins consumed in the form of fish. This map highlights the important role that fish play in East and Southeast Asia, as well as in West and Central Africa. Although people in this African region consume far less fish in absolute terms per capita than in the Asian region, fish is just as important as a food source for the Congolese and Tanzanians, for both Japanese and Indonesians.

As expected, most landlocked countries fall into the least fish product category, with the exception of Laos, Belarus, the Czech Republic, Austria and Switzerland, which consume between 10 and 20 pounds of fish per capita per year. Laos is located in the fishing block of East and Southeast Asia, where a large number of marine and freshwater creatures are eaten, partly for economic reasons and partly for religious reasons. The role of cultural factors, and not just the availability and costs of determining how much fish is consumed, is especially clear if we look at European countries.

Moving from west to east, the peoples of Atlantic Europe - Portuguese, Spanish, French, Dutch and British, as well as Scandinavians, Italians and Greeks predictably eat a lot of fish. Even in these countries, fish is more popular in coastal areas and ports, such as Galicia in northwestern Spain and Venice, whose cuisine is based on sea creatures from the Venetian lagoon. The peoples of Central Europe, especially Germans, Austrians and Czechs, were in the middle category. But the peoples of Eastern Europe outside the former Soviet Union - Poles, Slovaks, Romanians and Southern Slavs - eat less fish.

Thus, landlocked Belarus consumes more fish than Poland, located on the Baltic Sea, and landlocked Switzerland more than Albania on the Mediterranean coast. Unfortunately, it is unclear what is included in the “fish” category, and the numbers can vary significantly depending on whether shellfish and other types of fish seafood are included. Presumably, freshwater and marine fish are considered; otherwise, high levels of consumption found in poor, landlocked countries like Laos and Belarus would be inexplicable.

In Russia, freshwater fish is still extremely important; saltwater fish became common only in Soviet times. Traditionally, freshwater species, such as sturgeon, pike, eel, carp, raffe, pike perch, core and European perch, were most commonly consumed, which is easily explained by the fact that Russia has had no access to the sea for most of its history; Russia entered the war with a large number of wars. The only group that had regular access to salted fish was who fished at sea and bought fish from the Norwegians.

Traditional Russian fish dishes include fish soups and jellied fish, as well as boiled, steamed, stewed in sour cream, baked whole or fried in dough. Fish are usually eaten in Siberia. Although this has become very common over the past few decades, smoked fish has traditionally not eaten before the Russian Revolution.

In other countries, countries that consume large quantities of fish include Peru, Guyana, and French Guiana in South America; Gabon, Ghana and Senegal in Africa; Oman, United Arab Emirates and Qatar in the Persian Gulf region. To some extent, this is a feature of ocean currents, since the Humboldt Tok off the west coast of South America and Tokyo Namib off the coast of southwest Africa produces particularly rich fisheries.

The final set of maps focuses on the United States. As you can see from the top map, “carnivorous” eating habits are not evenly distributed throughout the country. Most meat per capita is consumed in central Texas, urban California, the metropolitan area of \u200b\u200bChicago, northern Georgia, and the Mid-Atlantic region. Although overall meat consumption tends to correlate with urban areas, residents in the northwestern Pacific Ocean, especially Portland and Seattle, consume far less meat; Bostonians eat even less.

The same areas where most meat is consumed also consume more fruits and vegetables, more than 190 pounds per capita per year. South, where many crops of this category can be easily grown. Once again, cultural characteristics play an important role.

We would like you to return to the “Languages \u200b\u200bof the World” in the future. If you want to receive updates on our latest posts, feel free to do so using any of your favorite methods below. Particularly fast consumption of beef, pork and poultry in developing countries - and there are huge problems.

Meat was a sumptuous meal not so long ago - even in industrialized countries. This is not surprising, given the enormous efforts necessary for its production: beef, pork, goat and poultry need to be bred, placed in the stable and fed with a huge amount of feed, which in turn requires huge arable land and irrigation.

Global agriculture is one of the biggest environmental pressures — how big is the new Meat Atlas, which now makes it clear. Per capita consumption was 42.5 kg per year on average worldwide. Although there are still clear differences between rich and poor, poorer countries are rapidly gaining momentum. In industrialized countries, meat consumption declined from 81 to 79 kilograms per capita over the same period.

The Germans eat an average of 60 kilograms of meat per year. Problem: parts of production - and with it the destruction of the environment associated with it - transfer Germans to remote countries. This is not without consequences. For example, the production of one kilogram of pork requires about a thousand liters of water, and for beef - even about a thousand liters. At the same time, 1, 1 billion people worldwide do not have access to clean drinking water.

In some countries, forests are widely cut to graze animals and receive arable land for the production of animal feed. According to Unmusig, in Argentina or Brazil, small farmers will have to give way to growing soybeans. “We also eat at the expense of the people of the Third World.”

After China, Europe is now the largest importer of soybeans, especially from Argentina and Brazil. The impact of meat production on the environment. He accused Federal Minister of Agriculture Ilze Aigner of not being able to initiate change. “He will continue to build new mega-containers, whose promotion makes meat at a discount store seem cheap.” The ministry rejected criticism.

Apparently, cheap meat is actually more expensive, Weiger said. The consumer must pay three times: “Once upon purchase of meat, then with tax money for new stables and slaughterhouses, and thirdly, for damage to the environment and health.” At some point, however, the publishers of Meat Atlas also go beyond the goal. The result is an increase in antibiotic resistance, which causes about 1,000 deaths in Europe each year. Although the use of antibiotics in the barn is by no means advisable. But most experts find it unlikely that the resulting microbes cause deaths among people, not to mention killing thousands per year.

For, if you follow the simple rules of hygiene in the kitchen and heat the meat, the danger of microbes is small. In any case, the times of cheap steak may end soon. Not only is humanity’s appetite for meat increasing, but the world's population itself is the fastest in those developing countries, whose inhabitants are increasingly eating meat. In the future, experts have been expecting recently, so Schnitzel could again become a luxury.

Meat Consumption Compared to Countries

This is more than twice the global average and about 22 times more than in India. Here are a few countries and regions for comparison. There is something for everyone up to the classic Holstein dairy cattle. The Germans eat a lot of meat compared to their European neighbors. In the European comparison, only Danes, Spaniards and Austrians eat more. Large quantities can only be produced by the factory. However, this damages the soil, climate and, according to many experts, health.

More and more fed without animal products

Could not play video. Please try again later. Without meat, Schnitzelbretchen and vegan chocolate - the tendency to life without animal products is becoming more and more. Many people celebrated World Vegetarian Day in Berlin. At the beginning of Great Lent, there are calls to reduce factory farming and eat less meat.

Higher prices for meat and sausage are possible

And they certainly hit consumers. At least if you think that the Germans regularly do in polls. Although most of them come from factory farming, the Germans do not limit the consumption of meat.

Record meat production year